READER ALERT: How Internet Companies Blatantly Lie About NSA Spying!

Tags

AOL, Apple, cell phones, cloaked, communications, corruption, cover-ups, covert operations, crimes, Facebook, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, felony, Forbes, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Google, Google CEO Larry Page, Hotmail, Illegal, internet, invasion, lies, Microsoft, National Security Agency, New York Times, NSA, Orwellian, PalTalk, PRISM, privacy, Skype, spying, terrorists, Time, Top Secret, trust, Twitter, U.S, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Government, United States, wormholes, Yahoo, YouTube

What do Google, AOL, Skype, Facebook, Apple, Hotmail and Yahoo all have in common? They have all been caught turning over private user data to the government’s spy agency, the NSA. All these companies routinely turn over the emails, voice calls, text chats, photos, files and even logins and passwords of their users, including Americans.

“There is a massive apparatus within the United States government that with complete secrecy has been building this enormous structure that has only one goal,” journalist Glenn Greenwald recently told Piers Morgan (who knows all about spying and hacking people’s private data). “And that is to destroy privacy and anonymity not just in the United States but around the world.”

Tech companies rush to issue (false) denials

Immediately after these revelations surfaced over the past few days, all these companies began denying any involvement with the NSA. “Google CEO Larry Page and Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg are denying reports that depict two of the Internet’s most influential companies as willing participants in a secret government program that gives the National Security Agency unfettered access to email and other personal information transmitted on various online services,” reports the San Francisco branch of CBS News.

But what nobody is yet revealing is that all these companies are required by law to LIE to their own customers about secret government surveillance.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, you see, makes it a federal crime for any company participating in the surveillance to publicly acknowledge the existence of that surveillance. Thus, executives at Facebook, Google, Skype and others would all face arrest and federal prosecution as “terrorists” if they admitted the truth to their own users.

That’s just how far down the rabbit hole this government surveillance program goes: Not only does the government spy on you and everything you do — “they quite literally can watch your ideas as you type” — the government can also force all the tech companies cooperating with the spying to publicly deny the existence of the program.

The New York Times goes on to report:

In at least two cases, at Google and Facebook, one of the plans discussed was to build separate, secure portals, like a digital version of the secure physical rooms that have long existed for classified information, in some instances on company servers. Through these online rooms, the government would request data, companies would deposit it and the government would retrieve it, people briefed on the discussions said.

This is how companies like Google and Facebook can claim, with a straight face, that the NSA doesn’t have “backdoor access to our servers.” They don’t need it! What actually happens is that Google, Facebook, Yahoo and others simply deposit all user data at another location — a “gateway” where the NSA copies it off.

Now you understand how to correctly parse this fake denial by Google’s chief executive Larry Page, who says, “The U.S. government does not have direct access or a ‘back door’ to the information stored in our data centers.”

It doesn’t need “direct access.” It has INDIRECT access that was set up by Google!

Here are the diagrams from the top secret PRISM program that tells the truth:

 Monitoring a target’s communication

These diagrams show how the bulk of the world’s electronic communications move through companies based in the United States.

Providers and data

The PRISM program collects a wide range of data from the nine companies, although the details vary by provider:

Participating providers

This one shows when each company joined the program, with Microsoft being the first, on Sept. 11, 2007, and Apple the most recent, in October 2012:

Source:   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/prism-collection-documents/

Read more important information here (source):  http://www.naturalnews.com/040692_NSA_spying_tech_companies_FISA.html

Are you concerned that your government is not only invading your privacy, but they are also violating the U.S. Constitution, which is illegal, to do so?  The U.S. Government does not trust you, because they fear that you will find out just how corrupt they have become! – John Loeffler, Fountain City, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

 

Advertisements

Stop CISPA!

Tags

CISPA, Facebook, Federal Government, internet, intrusion, invasion, law, privacy, Twitter, U.S. Government, United States, United States House of Representatives, United States Senate

This is personal!
Keep government out of our personal business!

 

GMO Corn Is Slowly Killing You!

Tags

agriculture, Americans, Bacillus Thuringiensis, Barack Obama, Bayer, Bt brinjal, Bt corn, Campaign, Canada, canola, consumers, corn, corruption, cotton, crop, crop failure, Cry1Ab, donations, Dow Chemical, Dupont, eggplant, email, EPA, Facebook, failure, farmers, FDA, Federal Government, Genetically modified maize, Genetically modified organism, Glyphosate, GMO, GMOs, Health, Health Problems, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Humans, India, insecticide, Jeffrey Smith, laboratories, lobbyists, Michael Taylor, Monsanto, moratorium, Organic Consumers Association, plants, poisonous, politicians, publications, Reproductive Toxicology, Roundup, soy, studies, Syngenta, tests, The Institute For Responsible Technology, Tom Vilsack, Toxic, Twitter, U.S, United States, United States Department of Agriculture, USDA

GMO Study: OMG, You’re Eating Insecticide…

Most Americans remain blissfully unaware (or don’t care) they are eating genetically-modified (GM) organisms every day. Passivity and blind faith in the USDA, FDA and EPA have largely contributed to this attitude. Perhaps that will change now that a new study reveals an insecticide produced in GM corn actually gets absorbed into the human body.

If you haven’t been paying attention to your food lately, biotechnology giants such as Monsanto thank you for that. Because behind your back, they’ve succeeded in replacing 86% of US corn with their patented insecticide-producing “frankencorn”.

The industry name for this is “Bt corn” and the insecticide is actually produced inside the plant, so it is impossible to wash it off. This is accomplished by inserting genes from the bacteria Bacillus Thuringiensis into the corn.

Up until now, scientists and multinational corporations such as Monsanto and DuPont have spent billions in lobbying, campaign donations and “testing” in an attempt to convince world governments that GMOs are safe. In the case of Bt corn, they stated the insecticide produced within the corn posed no danger to human health because it was broken down in the digestive system.

Despite corporate assurances, many have been skeptical. Non-GMO advocates such as Jeffrey Smith from The Institute For Responsible Technology and the Organic Consumers Association have long been concerned about the potential impact this Bt toxin could have on human health.

Scientists from the University of Sherbrooke, Canada, proved the validity of these concerns when they detected the insecticidal protein, Cry1Ab, circulating in the blood of both pregnant and non-pregnant women. They also detected the toxin in fetal blood, suggesting that the toxin can be passed on to the fetus. The research paper has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in the journal Reproductive Toxicology.

Neither the women studied or their spouses worked in agriculture. All reported to be consuming a typical Canadian diet that is virtually identical to the American diet.

“Generated data will help regulatory agencies responsible for the protection of human health to make better decisions”, said researchers Aziz Aris and Samuel Leblanc.

Unfortunately, I don’t feel that our pro-GMO Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack will pay attention to this research. I also doubt that our Deputy Commissioner of Foods Michael Taylor, who also happens to be Monsanto’s former vice-president, will pay this study much attention either. It doesn’t stop there. The revolving door is growing exponentially and the foxes have taken up residence in the hen house.

Are you pissed? You should be. We’ve let corporate interests turn us into poison-fed lab rats. It doesn’t end at corn either. 93% of both soy and canola are also genetically-modified. On top of that, Monsanto has acres of laboratories containing new mutant species awaiting to slip into your pantry. You’re probably wearing some of their Bt cotton right now. It comprises 93% of US cotton and 68% of Chinese cotton.

Perhaps you’ve heard of the uproar around Bt brinjal, a GM variety of eggplant, in India. When it was approved in 2009, a country-wide protest began and the Indian government applied a moratorium on its release.

Meanwhile, here in the US, GMO crops are getting approved left and right and most Americans still don’t even know what “GMO” even means.

Want to do something about it? We can’t rely on our regulatory agencies to do it for us and we possess more power than we think. It won’t take much to reach the tipping point of consumer rejection and get these “frankenfoods” out of our lives. Information spreads like wildfire these days with Facebook, Twitter and email. Tell your family and friends and vote with your dollar, the world’s food supply depends on it! Now that you know, it’s your responsibility to pass it on.

Source:  http://foodintegritynow.org/2011/05/19/gmo-study-omg-you%E2%80%99re-eating-insecticide/

 

The De-humanization of Civilization?

Tags

applications, bond, cell phones, chaos, civilization, communication, consequences, contact, de-personalization, earth, evolution, Facebook, family, friends, future, generations, global, government, high-tech, Humans, information, iPads, iPhones, Mother Nature, Nanotechnology, panic, personal, planet, population, satellite, survival, sustain, technology, Twitter, War, world

Today’s High-tech, No-touch World

We are living in a constantly evolving world where human contact is becoming more infrequent.  Why is it happening, and what are the consequences?

Technological advances are growing quicker than the human mind can comprehend.  For example, in my younger days it was very common for kids to play games of kickball during the summer, and build snow forts together during the winter.  Of course the snowball fights quickly followed, and everyone involved had a good time.  We laughed, we felt the mind-numbing cold around us, but it did not matter.  We were having fun!

The fun of our youth has been replaced by interactive applications that we now use to contact each other like Facebook and Twitter.  We use cell phones, iPhones, iPads, and ever-increasing smaller products to connect with each other in much more informal ways than ever before!  Think about it:  When was the last time you used a regular phone or had written a personal letter to a family member or a friend?

You do not feel the need to do these things, because society is becoming so advanced that it has made human to human contact less likely.  We use drones to fight wars now, and our governments can pinpoint your location and eavesdrop on your personal interactions with others via satellite technology flying through the earth’s orbit!

It is amazing how our society has become so un-personalized in such a short amount of time.  It’s mind-boggling that Nanotechnology is furthering the non-evolution of contact, and it is stretching us further and further apart.  Essentially, it is de-humanizing us!

 

 

While technology is crucial to our survival in this world of 7+ billion people, we also must not forget that human to human contact is critical for our survival.  What if computers crashed or a cataclysmic event caused us to rely on direct human contact to survive?  The world would panic, and chaos would erupt on a global scale.  Our earth that we take advantage of so much was not meant to sustain such a large number of people.  One day, this planet may decide to shake us off like a bad case of fleas.  Then, the evolutionary process would have no choice but to start over.  Scary thought?  More frightening is the concept that this could happen at any time in our lives or our future generations’ lives!

Stop and take the time to talk to your family, friends, a neighbor, and re-establish the personal bond that all of us need, but we are in extreme lack of due to the fast-paced speedway of a world in which we live.

By John E Loeffler