LOL! Pretty much right!
Baghdad, Bradley Manning, citizens, corruption, cover-ups, covert operations, crimes, deaths, Fort Meade Maryland, History, Inhumane, innocent, Iraq, Iraq War, Julian Assange, Leaks, Political corruption, torture, treatment, Trial, truth, U.N., U.S, U.S. Government, U.S. Military, United States, Video, Wikileaks
As I type these lines, on June 3, 2013, Private First Class Bradley Edward Manning is being tried in a sequestered room at Fort Meade, Maryland, for the alleged crime of telling the truth. The court martial of the most prominent political prisoner in modern US history has now, finally, begun.
“For me, I stopped keeping track,” he told the court last November. “I didn’t know whether night was day or day was night. And my world became very, very small. It became these cages… I remember thinking I’m going to die.”
After protests from his lawyers, Bradley Manning was then transferred to a brig at a US Marine Corps Base in Quantico, VA, where – infamously – he was subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment at the hands of his captors – a formal finding by the UN. Isolated in a tiny cell for twenty-three out of twenty-four hours a day, he was deprived of his glasses, sleep, blankets and clothes, and prevented from exercising. All of this – it has been determined by a military judge – “punished” him before he had even stood trial.
“Brad’s treatment at Quantico will forever be etched, I believe, in our nation’s history, as a disgraceful moment in time” said his lawyer, David Coombs. “Not only was it stupid and counterproductive, it was criminal.”
Read more here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julian-assange/julian-assange-bradley-manning-trial_b_3384436.html?utm_hp_ref=daily-brief?utm_source=DailyBrief&utm_campaign=060513&utm_medium=email&utm_content=BlogEntry
aquifer, Athabasca oil sands, Authors, Barack Obama, Big Oil, Canada, Canadian, China, Conflict, consequences, construction, corporations, cover-up, coverup, crude oil, Dirty Fossil Fuels, environment, environmental catastrophe, environmental disaster, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, fossil fuels, greed, Gulf of Mexico, hidden, Interest, Keystone Pipeline, Keystone XL, Keystone XL Pipeline, Koch Brothers, Koch Industries, Leaks, mega-corporation, Mining, money, Mother Jones Magazine, oil industry, pollution, power, power-hungry, President, Public, Public Awareness, public health hazards, review, Shell Oil, shipping, special interests, State Department, Tar Sands, Tar Sands Pipelines, Texas, Toxic, TransCanada, TransCanada Corporation, truth, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, U.S. State Department, United States Department of State, water pollution
Mother Jones Magazine has uncovered a new twist in the fight against the Keystone XL pipeline. As it turns out the authors who drafted the environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline worked for TransCanada, Koch Industries, Shell Oil, and other oil corporations that stand to benefit from building the Keystone XL. Not only did the State Department know about these conflicts of interest, they redacted this information from public filings in (a) attempt to conceal the truth.
In order to build the pipeline, Transcanada, the company who proposed Keystone XL, must get the OK from the State Department. The State Department bases its decision on whether or not to approve the pipeline on an environmental review, conducted by a third party group overseen by the State Department and paid for by Transcanada.
*Please click the following link for more important information on this:
John Loeffler – Fountain City, Wisconsin
"Fast and Furious", "Richard Windsor", "sue and settle", "war on coal", "Windsorgate", 1970, accounts, action, activists, Activities, administrator, Administrator Jackson, agency, agenda, agendas, alias, Allies, America, American, Americans, analyst, answers, arm, arming, Attorney General, avoid, beneficiaries, beneficiary, blackout, bogus, boss, cartel, cartels, caught, CEI, cement plants, chairman, cheaters, cheating, chemical firms, Christopher Horner, Competitive Enterprise Institute, comply, conceal, concealment, Concerns, Congress, congressional, congressional oversight, contempt, controversial, controversy, corruption, Court, court order, cover-up, created, criminal, criminal prosecutions, critics, Daily Caller, dealings, demands, Department of Energy, deserve, destruction, disgrace, Documents, dodge, DOE, DOJ, dollars, drug, Drugs, E.P.A., Earthjustice, Economy, email, email accounts, emails, environment, environmental, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Eric Holder, estimates, evade, evidence, ex, exposed, exposure, extremist, fake, federal, federal courts, federal law, Forbes, formal, fraud, Freedom of Information Act, GAO, GOP, greed, green, groups, headlines, House Science Committee, identities, incriminating, industries, investigation, Jobs, justice, Larry Bell, law, law-enforcement, lawless, lawmakers, laws, lawsuit, letter, letters, lies, Lisa Jackson, lives, mandatory, mass media, media, media coordinator, Mexican, millions, mining operations, money, name, Natural Resources Defense Council, Nicole Ciandella, nightmare, non-disclosure, NRDC, Obama, Obama Administration, Obama Justice Department, obey, Officials, organization, oversight, Policy, policymakers, power, power plants, PR, President, propaganda, prosecution, Public, public relations, questions, radical, record, record-keeping, Records, refineries, refusal, refuse, regulations, reign, release, reports, Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas), Republicans, request, requirements, research, researcher, resignation, restrictions, Richard Nixon, ripoff, rogue, scandals, scheme, schemes, scrutiny, secret, secret email accounts, secret emails, sectors, Senator David Vitter (R-Louisiana), Senior Fellow, settle, settlements, shady, studies, study, success, successful, sue, suspicion, suspicious, tax, Tax Dollars, taxpayer-funded, taxpayers, terror, The New American, the Sierra Club, timely, top, transparency, trust, truth, U.S., U.S. Chamber of Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, unacceptable, Unconstitutional, unconstitutional executive order, United States, unlawful, violating, violations, Washington Examiner, watchdog
The Environmental Protection Agency and its disgraced former boss Lisa Jackson are under fire from lawmakers and activists for, among other reasons, having recently been exposed violating federal law by using bogus identities and e-mail accounts to coordinate propaganda and policy with media allies, “green” groups, and policymakers to advance the Obama administration’s radical “environmental” agenda. Other EPA corruption is also still in the headlines, too, with the agency being criticized for ripping off U.S. taxpayers and foisting more unconstitutional regulations on the economy by working with extremist pseudo-environmental groups using a controversial scheme dubbed “sue and settle.”
The most recent major scandal, which began unraveling late last year after a federal court ruling, involves former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, who conveniently announced her resignation in late December. The self-styled “most progressive EPA chief in history” was caught, apparently in violation of federal law, using the fake name “Richard Windsor” and a bogus e-mail account to conspire with allies in the establishment media and friendly policymakers. The shady dealings were part of an effort to promote Jackson and the Obama administration’s wildly unconstitutional policies without being exposed to public scrutiny.
The pseudonym and fake e-mail account scandal, already being called “Windsorgate,” was essentially aimed at skirting federal record-keeping laws barring the use of fake names in official government dealings, according to analysts. The other purpose of the unlawful scheme, first uncovered by a researcher at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, was to conceal the lawless EPA boss’s activities from mandatory public and congressional oversight. After a Freedom of Information Act request and a successful lawsuit by CEI, however, the whole plot is slowly coming to light.
Unsurprisingly, the EPA — created in 1970 by an unconstitutional “executive order” issued by then-President Richard Nixon — is still trying to hide as much of the incriminating evidence as possible using bogus justifications. Among other concerns, the agency has been redacting — blacking out — massive segments of the documents it was forced to release under court order. It flat out refused to release hundreds more.
Indeed, CEI Senior Fellow Christopher Horner told the Washington Examiner his organization estimates that about 85 percent of the “Richard Windsor” e-mails released last week were redacted. The concealment of the information was “justified,” according to the EPA, under the FOIA’s exemption for documents dealing with a “deliberative process” used in formulating policy — possibly including the lawless policies surrounding the administration’s so-called “war on coal.”
Now, however, lawmakers and watchdog groups are starting to ask serious questions and demand answers. “For the sake of transparency, and of easing the road ahead for the next EPA administrator, we hope the EPA starts providing some answers,”noted CEI media coordinator Nicole Ciandella in a statement published by the Daily Caller, pointing out that the agency continues to stonewall all efforts to get to the truth. Other officials are publicly hammering the EPA as well.
Aside from the CEI, members of Congress are also trying to find out just what was going on at the EPA. Last month, for example, Republicans on the House Science Committee sent yet another letter to Jackson demanding that she hand over the documents — the third official request from the committee lawmakers since November of last year, when the scandal was first becoming a major public concern and a PR nightmare for the agency.
“The use of a false identity raises serious questions about whether the EPA has adequately preserved related records. Despite these legitimate concerns, the EPA has thus far refused to comply with the Committee’s request,” states the January 23 letter signed by six congressmen, adding that continued refusal to comply was “unacceptable” and could result in formal action to force the agency to obey.
The House committee’s letter continued, demanding answers. “As we mentioned in our previous letter, the public trusts that its government will operate in an open and transparent manner,” the lawmakers wrote. “EPA regulations have a significant impact on the everyday lives of Americans, and the agency should implement them in a manner that respects the public’s trust.”
The committee chairman, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), has also been vocal in demanding answers, but so far, few have been forthcoming. “The American public deserves to know whether Administrator Jackson’s secret email accounts were appropriately maintained by the agency according to requirements by federal law. If they have nothing to hide, why not comply with our request?” Rep. Smith wondered. “EPA’s refusal only adds to suspicion that Administrator Jackson’s secret email accounts were intended to evade transparency and circumvent congressional oversight.”
In the Senate, lawmakers are speaking out, too. Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), for example, said he thought the EPA alias scandal was the real reason for Jackson’s well-timed resignation in late December. “I think this e-mail issue clearly spurred Lisa Jackson’s resignation,” Sen. Vitter was quoted as saying. “But it’s much broader than her. It’s about a culture of hiding an extreme agenda from Americans because it can’t be sustained in public debate.”
Some critics of the administration are even calling for a proper law-enforcement investigation and potential criminal prosecutions, saying it was obvious that federal law had been violated. However, with Attorney General Eric Holder already facing criminal contempt of Congress charges for covering up the Obama Justice Department’s “Fast and Furious” scheme arming certain Mexican drug cartels, the chances of justice being served, at this point at least, appear slim. Holder, in fact, is currently abusing his position as DOJ boss to avoid prosecution himself.
Meanwhile, despite repeatedly promising to run the “most transparent” and “open” administration in history, this is not the first time President Obama’s top officials have been caught trying to unlawfully avoid federal record-keeping laws. As The New American reported in August, scandals swirling around the Department of Energy, for example, are strikingly similar. Top officials there were exposed using private e-mail accounts for official business — again in an apparent effort to unlawfully conceal their shady dealings from the public and Congress.
Another EPA scandal back in the headlines this week is the so-called “sue and settle” scam, used by various agencies and especially the EPA, to rip off taxpayers, provide public money to extremist groups, and implement unconstitutional regulations by fiat. Essentially, the process works like this: A radical green group sues the EPA in court demanding that the agency do something — pass more unconstitutional, economy-destroying regulations, for example. Then, the agency agrees to “settle,” taking the lawless actions that were already being sought by the administration while offering huge taxpayer-funded “settlements” to the organization that sued.
Millions of tax dollars have been funneled to extremist “green” groups using this tactic in recent decades, according to a 2011 official report by the GAO cited by Forbes energy and environment analyst Larry Bell. Among the largest beneficiaries of the scam — aside from the administration in its efforts to foist more lawlessness and pain on the American people — were organizations such as Earthjustice, the Sierra Club, and the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce studied the issue and concluded in a report that the “sue and settle” scam was responsible for many of the EPA’s “most controversial, economically significant regulations that have plagued the business community for the past few years.” The study found that among the regulations imposed on the American people using the strategy were restrictions on power plants, refineries, mining operations, cement plants, chemical firms, and numerous other industries and sectors, Bellreported.
Members of Congress have been meekly trying to rein in the out-of-control EPA for years. However, with each successive administration, the rogue, unconstitutional entity continues to usurp more and more power — destroying countless jobs and lives in the process. Critics of the agency, however, say it is time for lawmakers to abolish the EPA altogether. Not only is there no constitutional authority for such an agency, its lawless reign of terror is contributing to the destruction of the already-battered American economy — all with virtually no real benefits to the environment.
Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, politics, and more. He can be reached firstname.lastname@example.org.